It seems that the Himalayas are safe, the glaciers will not, as claimed, melt by 2035. A claim that given that this is 25 years away should have raised some scepticism in the first place.
Behind it, there is the usual peril of science for sale, and that's the bad bit. Seeking grants from the Carnegie Corporation amongst others, the claim was added to the grant requests. If, as a layman, you get such a statement from an apparently reputable source, then wouldn't you reach for the cheque book, after all, we are talking about the water supply to 40% of the world's population?
It is not that there was no dissent to this point of view.
"Last November, however, Dr Raina, the country's most senior glaciologist, published a report for the Indian government showing that the rate of retreat of Himalayan glaciers had not increased in the past 50 years and that the IPCC's predictions were recklessly alarmist. This provoked the furious reaction from Dr Pachauri that tarred Dr Raina's report as "arrogant" and "voodoo science". Only weeks later came the devastating revelation that the IPCC's own prediction had no scientific foundation."
I've said it before, and here I say it again. The world is a disastrous state of overpopulation, resource depletion, and pollution. We need to react, and react now. What we do not need is one of the greatest potential misallocation of resources in the history of the world.
My feeling is that with the total unravelling of the Copenhagen process, we may have dodged a major bullet.